![]() For its part, the Nunes memorandum, released in February of this year after the White House conveniently declassified its details, reflects the accuracy you would expect from the man who later admitted that, despite having access to the full text of those Carter Page FISA applications prior to releasing the memo, never took the time to read them. Whatever else the investigation into Russian election interference may ultimately produce, it should be increasingly obvious that there is no material substance to the charges that Nunes and the Fox News echo chamber have leveled condemning the FISA applications to surveil Carter Page. First approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in October 2016, and later extended by those three renewal applications at 90-day intervals, each one approved by a different, Republican-appointed judge serving on the FISC, the Page surveillance has become a cause célèbre for Devin Nunes, his coterie of Republican comrades on the House Intelligence Committee, and their daily provocateurs at Fox News. While Mueller ultimately found questionable ties between Trump's campaign and Russia, he concluded there was not sufficient evidence to pursue criminal charges.ĭemocrats have lambasted the Durham probe as politically motivated, but the Biden administration has not stopped it.ĭurham's probe has already indicted a cybersecurity lawyer accused of making a false statement to the FBI and an FBI lawyer who admitted to altering an email.Much has been said and written about the initial (and three subsequent) applications used to obtain authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to electronically surveil former Trump foreign policy advisor Carter Page. He pointed to the dossier, some of which remains uncorroborated or has been discredited, as evidence of a tainted probe driven by Democrats.īut the dossier had no role in the launching of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation, which was placed in the hands of special counsel Robert Mueller. Trump claimed the investigation of campaign ties to Russia was a witch hunt. ![]() Under Trump, the Justice Department appointed Durham to carry out an investigation into the dossier. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video What is behind the investigations? The dossier was ultimately used by the FBI as it applied for and received surveillance warrants targeting a former Trump campaign aide.ĭanchenko allegedly lied about the source of information included in the so-called "Steele dossier" when questioned about his work, the Justice Department stated.ĭanchenko is the third person, and second in a two-month span, to face charges related to the dossier.Ĭombating election interference | GMF compact What did Igor Danchenko do?ĭanchenko functioned as a source for Christopher Steele, a former British spy who was paid by Democrats to compile the dossier into links between Russia and Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign. The dossier and the Durham probe have faced accusations that they are politically motivated. ![]() Igor Danchenko is facing charges of providing false statements to the FBI as part of special counsel John Durham's ongoing investigation. US authorities have arrested a Russia analyst who provided information for a Democrat-funded dossier on former President Donald Trump's ties to Russia during the 2016 US presidential election, the US Justice Department said Thursday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |